this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
892 points (81.4% liked)

Political Memes

6300 readers
2149 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

then you can start a fucking civil war over it, it's literally the law, federally, and in most states.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean when you say states? The states themselves have a law that says how many years a president may be president?

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

so, US presidential elections are weird, because the states have a significant deal of authority when it comes to running the presidential election, this is why the things like the amendment 14 thing happened prior to the election. States have a CONSIDERABLE amount of authority over these to a point where any sort of conjoined fraud would be incredibly difficult.

If we get to a point where the fed goes "fuck it three term presidents" and the states go "uh, nuh uh" you can basically tank an entire election by simply not putting that candidate on the ballot, the question is whether or not this holds up in the supreme court, the answer, should be yes, because that's what the constitution says, and you can bet your ass it won't be amended anytime soon. So there would either have to be MASSIVE levels of collusion in the federal government (to the point that a civil war is likely to start) or it would be like two states that don't put the candidate on the ballot.

It's a very surefire way to cause problems in an election, and it gets messy very very quickly, so the federal government at all costs should stay far away from this.

Also, regarding state law, im guessing a lot of states have similar term limits, i'm not sure any have any explicit term limits of presidential terms, but given that it's in the constitution, i'm guessing a few of them have that somewhere. If not in their constitution directly.