this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
1092 points (98.8% liked)
Microblog Memes
6721 readers
1279 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They approve more than they deny by far. The worst example would is probably UHC and even they only denied between 18-32% depending on who you ask.
And, very few people apparently know this, but you can and should appeal those coverage denials.
By the numbers, health insurance allows more people to get coverage than without, and therefor are a net positive.
I'm an advocate for singlepayer, I don't think health insurance companies should exist, but if we don't convince citizens to vote differently then we're not going to accomplish any good at all by killing some expendable erectile dysfunctional suits.
Only
Yet there are more than two choices. It’s not useful to claim the current system is a net positive because the only worse option is no coverage
Every medical provider I’ve dealt with has people to handle this. They have to spend money hire extra people to redo paperwork, resubmit claims, until it comes through. Is this a good use of anyone’s time or money?
There are only two choices, insured or uninsured. The third choice is locked behind voting blue and demonstrably the USA would rather die.
From over here in one of the bluest states, believe me I know. The rest of y’all struggling to vote against fascism, and we’re trying to hit 70% blue