this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
24 points (100.0% liked)

World News

43247 readers
3711 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

IT WOULD BE WRONG to think that this was all inevitable. The Conservatives might try to make it sound that way. They might suggest, perhaps, that Mark Carney’s victory in the Liberal leadership race was, like Michael Ignatieff’s, simply a matter of being anointed. Indeed, Carney has flirted with the Liberal Party for a while. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appointed him last September as chair of the Liberal task force on economic growth. And Carney’s name has been floated publicly since at least late 2023 as a potential successor to Trudeau—including by Carney himself.

All that said, not too long ago, Carney wasn’t the frontrunner in this race. It was Chrystia Freeland. Her abrupt departure and resignation letter, in which she implied the prime minister was wasting time on “costly political gimmicks,” not only precipitated Trudeau’s resignation but also initially positioned her as a strong candidate to replace him. It probably wasn’t until Carney showed up on The Daily Show, affably chuckling with Jon Stewart, that people started to think he might just have the chops for this sort of thing.

But it was against Trump—or at least against Trump’s economic and, at times, geographic imperialism—that Carney looked strongest amongst his peers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Astra_Inclinant@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

It was revealed that Freeland was going to be fired anyways and she resigned just to try and save face.

She held 4 different minister positions over the last 10 years, the last one being minister of finance. (Funny how horribly our economy is right now, isn't it?)

She had zero chance here. Even without Carney running, no one thought she was a going to be a good PM. If by some miracle she won the liberal race, she would have been slaughtered by Pierre.

Liberals have a real chance with Carney.

[–] ebc@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

I liked Freeland because Russia hates her. I also think she did a good job handling Trump in the NAFTA re-negotiation 4 years ago. Both her and Carney were very good options for Canada, IMO.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago

Blaming Freeland for everything is weak at best. She wasn't in control of policy and wasn't in control of the PMO.

Freeland has a shit ton of baggage but not one of the things you pointed to are in the list.

[–] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

CANADA DOESNT NEED A SMALL pp