Firefox

20384 readers

126 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

Mozilla’s response to proposed remedies in U.S. v. Google | The Mozilla Blog (blog.mozilla.org)

submitted 4 months ago by that_leaflet@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

users can disable ad blockers on conforming websites.

We all know that this won't happen. In reality there are only two major groups of people: Those who do not use ad blockers and have accepted ads everywhere, and those who use ad blockers and accept ads nowhere.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

I think that's looking at it the wrong way. I think there are three kinds of people:

People who won't pay regardless
People who will pay regardless
People who will pay a reasonable price

Some in each group use ad blockers, and I think group 3 is quite large.