this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
1101 points (98.8% liked)

World News

45228 readers
5024 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 190 points 6 days ago (5 children)
[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 149 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Latest FDA guidance: Take vitamin A, wash it down with raw milk, and attend virus spreading parties to build natural immunity.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 33 points 6 days ago (3 children)

That last part actually works by culling the people who have the most severe symptoms. So you would be building natural immunity in the population, over a long period of time, by dying before you produce offspring.

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 31 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Only for more genetically stable diseases that don't mutate into new strains every single year.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 13 points 6 days ago

Guess we'll just have to cull the herd every year then.

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Except you supercharge the mutation of the disease as well, so its a rinse and repeat cycle.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So human keeps dropping and more remote work?

[–] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The ones forced to go to work keep dropping.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 1 points 5 days ago

Sad truth. The heros called what again during covid?

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 days ago

Shit, I already have kids. Might as well skip it then.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Yeah, imma do this instead. The FDA seems trustworthy.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (1 children)

FDA approval in never.

I'm not even bothering with FDA recommendations anymore with Kennedy in charge. I'll be reading the Canada Health and NHS (UK) notices. If it means crossing a national border to get a vaccine, I'm onboard.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

there are some international pharm companies that produces vaccines, im sure they wouldnt mind doing it,. glaxo kline smith is one of them, although people have dislike the company for many reasons.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 days ago

Hard for them to approve it if there is no FDA.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Theoretically, this could approved in Europe, which is fine for me. But I doubt the pharmaceutical industry will let a working, permanent immunisation against the common cold happen. That would mean billions and trillions of lost business.

[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I never understand it when this argument is made. It assumes that there aren't entities out there making $0 on the common cold that would refuse to take the absolute fucking windfall that would be generated if such an immunization were to be brought to the market.

Like "oh, you know, we'd like to make this immunization and make billions of dollars ourselves but these OTHER guys are already making billions of dollars and we sure wouldn't want to step on their toes."

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, consider all the money that pharmaceutical companies make every year on over the counter medicines for cold symptoms. I'm sure it's not a perfect example of malfeasance like "hey, we have this perfect cure for the cold in our pockets but we make more profits from our over the counter cold medicines so let's just bury the cure", but through a complicated process they often end up at a similar result.

Recent example: https://www.propublica.org/article/how-big-pharma-company-stalled-tuberculosis-vaccine-to-pursue-bigger-profits

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I sorta don't understand this. A TB vaccine has definately been around for awhile and the article does not seem to say what would make this one special. Is it the same vaccine with the thing they says makes vaccines more potent added and they are just not adding it???

[–] turtle@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It sounds like this new vaccine would be 50% effective (including adults?), according to the ProPublica article. The old vaccine, BCG, appears to only be 37% effective on children, not adults (based on a web search - edit: on a second look, different articles are claiming wildly different effectiveness rates for BCG). The disease kills 1.6 million people annually. In other words, it sounds like this new vaccine would save tons of lives compared to the old one.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

i think only the USa DOESNT routinely vaccinate it against it, because they havnt found much efficacy, TB endemic areas do vaccinate against it, but it has limited efficacy. on the plus side, it is used with cancer therapy as a indirect effect to stimulate the immune system.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

The point is that some businesses react rather violently on the loss of billions.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

its pretty hard to vaccinate against the common cold, since coronavirus only represents like 15ish percent, the majority are all rhinoviruses there arnt any vaccines for those because theres too many strains(like 200+) to deal with, and also its so self-limiting its not worht it to produce anyway, in addition to trying to figure out which virus is causing the cold and which strain. also there a bunch of other viruses that causes colds, like entero,adeno, parainfluenza, RSV,,,etc.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I'm well aware of that, but taking only 15% out of a multi-billion-a-year market is still money. And there has been research into dealing with rhinoviruses in general, too, so that would take an even larger chunk.

[–] dzso@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

FDA? That still exists?