this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2025
766 points (99.2% liked)

News

28372 readers
4719 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Critics accused Trump and his administration of using ChatGPT to create its new tariff formula, which mirrors AI-generated outputs.

Commentators highlighted that the tariffs appear based on a simplistic calculation: divide the U.S. trade deficit with a country by total imports, or default to 10%.

Analysts slammed the approach as flawed and dangerous.

Markets reacted sharply, with the S&P 500 falling over 4% and Nasdaq dropping more than 5%.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s official then: the president is an unnecessary role and can be outsourced to a computer. Too bad so sad bye Donald.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly, so many companies want to start with getting rid of skilled labor and try using "AI" to write code and so on; I don't know why the board doesn't ask the C-suite to replace THEMSELVES with "AI" for an experiment and see how that goes instead...the cost savings would be immense and they would no longer have to deal with outsized egos, to boot.

Oh, why don't they do this, at least in my view? Oh, probably because all these people sit on each others' boards and they aren't about to show what a sham C-suite work is...

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

LLMs are already at the point where they could replace middle management in most places. Of course that's more of a reflection on how poor middle management is, not how good LLMs are.

And yeah the C-suite probably could be replaced too. Yeah the LLMs will hallucinate and make terrible decisions sometimes, but that's not different than what the C-suite is already.

Wanting to replace skilled labour with AI is proof of that. They don't know enough about what their employees do if they think an AI will work as a replacement. But if they can mange employees with an inaccurate understanding of what they do, then an AI with a inaccurate understanding of what employees could replace that manager.