Programming

19468 readers

143 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Follow the programming.dev instance rules
Keep content related to programming in some way
If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

snowe@programming.dev

Ategon@programming.dev

MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz

What SDLC Paradigm Did You Use in Your Project? (programming.dev)

submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Cheezyburger@programming.dev to c/programming@programming.dev

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi everyone! I’m a student currently working on a research activity for our Software Engineering class, and I’d really appreciate your insights. 😊

I’m looking to gather input from software developers, project managers, or engineers about the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) paradigms you've used in your past or current projects.

If you have a few minutes to spare, I’d love to hear your answers to these quick questions:

What type of software did you develop? (e.g., mobile app, enterprise system, game, etc.)
Which software development paradigm did your team follow? (eg. Prototyping Model, Spiral Model, Fourth Generation Techniques (4GT), Waterfall Model Agile Model, V-Shaped Model, Incremental Model, RAD (Rapid Application Development), Feature Driven Development (FDD), Big Bang Model, Scrum, etc)
Why did you choose that particular paradigm? (e.g., client requirement, team familiarity, project scale, etc.)

Your input will be used for academic purposes only, and it would really help me complete this task with real-world insights. Thank you so much in advance!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gsv@programming.dev 2 points 6 days ago

There’s many pathways to get there. In my case it’s a classic science career. Whether that is better for the WLB is likely open for debate. 🙈 There’s a growing understanding in science that there’s a need for tenured scientific programmers supporting the compute infrastructure and development. These roles are quite rare though and thus there is tons of competition. Long story short: It’s a challenge. The good thing is that there’s many jobs out there with the meaning we seek.