this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
653 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

69247 readers
3783 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter (now X) and Square (now Block), sparked a weekend’s worth of debate around intellectual property, patents, and copyright, with a characteristically terse post declaring, “delete all IP law.”

X’s current owner Elon Musk quickly replied, “I agree.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The GPL relies on copyright law to keep software free.

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, we'd have to shift tactics. But, without IP law protections, the hacker community would double down on reverse engineering and binary patching. Debian etc. would still be available, but you'd also see spins on Adobe, Apple, Microsoft, and Google software based on decompiling, patching, and rebuilding, or just game genie / PC game cracks binary patching based on offset and signature.

The DMCA would dissolve and encrypted data that was expected to be decrypted on the fly ("streaming only") would just be published fully decrypted.

It would be a revolutionary shift, but I'm not convinced it would be worse.

What would be worse is keeping IP law, but only having it enforced by million dollar yearly budget teams of lawyers and not protecting creators from having their works fed to "AI" and regurgitated as slop.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Making source available suddenly makes it free of copyright

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No it doesn't. The GPL provides a license to copy it as long as certain conditions are met. Availability has nothing to do with it.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Okay but reverse engineering is no longer under any protection because no ip