this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
1486 points (95.8% liked)

memes

14346 readers
3209 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

If that email needs to go to a client or stakeholder, then our culture won't accept just the prompt.

Where it really shines is translation, transcription and coding.

Programmers can easily double their productivity and increase the quality of their code, tests and documentation while reducing bugs.

Translation is basically perfect. Human translators aren't needed. At most they can review, but it's basically errorless, so they won't really change the outcome.

Transcribing meetings also works very well. No typos or grammar errors, only sometimes issues with acronyms and technical terms, but those are easy to spot and correct.

[–] Hexarei@programming.dev 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a programmer, there are so very few situations where I've seen LLMs suggest reasonable code. There are some that are good at it in some very limited situations but for the most part they're just as bad at writing code as they are at everything else.

[–] Mavytan@feddit.nl 1 points 6 days ago

I think the main gain is in automation scripts for people with little coding experience. They don't need perfect or efficient code, they just need something barely functioning which is something that LLMs can generate. It doesn't always work, but most of the time it works well enough

[–] Harlehatschi@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Programmers can double their productivity and increase quality of code?!? If AI can do that for you, you're not a programmer, you're writing some HTML.

We tried AI a lot and I've never seen a single useful result. Every single time, even for pretty trivial things, we had to fix several bugs and the time we needed went up instead of down. Every. Single. Time.

Best AI can do for programmers is context sensitive auto completion.

Another thing where AI might be useful is static code analysis.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Not really. As a programmer who doesn't deal with math like at all, just working on overly-complicated CRUD's, and even for me the AI is still completely wrong and/or waste of time 9 times out of 10. And I can usually spot when my colleagues are trying to use LLM's because they submit overly descriptive yet completely fucking pointless refactors in their PR's.