this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
1147 points (97.6% liked)

People Twitter

6835 readers
559 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Don't see you providing any sources mate

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

I don't need sources to be skeptical. you made a claim. I'm asking you to support that claim with good science.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The sources are in the references to the papers that you're presenting. The LCA studies themselves often come with a warning that it shouldn't be combined with other LCA studies, but poore-nemecek actually took an even lazier approach were they compiled meta studies that were ignoring this guidance and didn't actually source many if any LCA studies themselves. when reading the meta studies that they gathered, you can see that all of them say that LCA guidance discourages combining studies as they have done, but they're just going to do it anyway.

it's bad science.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 days ago

feel free to read the references. you don't have to read much past the abstract of most of poore-nemecek's references to see that what I'm saying is true.