this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
261 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

69726 readers
3741 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
261
Chips aren’t improving like they used to, and it’s killing game console price cuts (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by j4p@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
115 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"These price increases have multiple intertwining causes, some direct and some less so: inflation, pandemic-era supply crunches, the unpredictable trade policies of the Trump administration, and a gradual shift among console makers away from selling hardware at a loss or breaking even in the hopes that game sales will subsidize the hardware. And you never want to rule out good old shareholder-prioritizing corporate greed.

But one major factor, both in the price increases and in the reduction in drastic “slim”-style redesigns, is technical: the death of Moore’s Law and a noticeable slowdown in the rate at which processors and graphics chips can improve."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You can build a pretty capable PC for about $600. And you won't have to pay for multiplayer.

[–] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

If I'm building a PC for gaming, I wouldn't limit myself to $600. Would you? I've never not had PCs or laptops since I first had one in the 90s. I'm building again now to go Linux. 7800xt and 2 Tb SSD cost as much as a PS5 Pro in my part of the world. I only started getting into consoles because I can afford it now, and for physical games. I don't really get why today it's PC vs. consoles. I was into PCs but never judged consoles as inferior, just different.

[–] Skyline969@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Along with paying for multiplayer I get access to a large catalog of games as well as additional games every month. Yes they’re inaccessible if I stop paying, but that’s not really a big deal. Even all that aside, I pretty much play single player games anyway.

Also, when a game comes out I know it’ll work. No driver bugs, no messing with settings, no checking minimum and recommended specs, it just works. And it works the same for everyone on the platform. I don’t have any desire to spend a bunch of time tweaking settings to get things just right, only to have the game crash for some esoteric reason or another.

[–] Grangle1@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Pretty capable" will get you dunked on in the PC gaming world. For what I've seen PC gamers actually recommend I could buy 2-3 modern consoles.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

That's just nonsense. Maybe some 13 year olds with rich parents think like that.