this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
276 points (97.6% liked)

World News

46388 readers
3212 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is "gay erasure" please. That's not too much to ask, surely?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Tell you what, go to that wiki, scroll down and take a gander at the part that says "reference" and let me know what you see? That's not too much to ask, surely?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Tell you what, go to that wiki, scroll down and take a gander at the part that says "reference" and let me know what you see? That's not too much to ask, surely?

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Show me a source. Wikipedia is not a source. Show me 1 specific example of a law that is “gay erasure” please. That’s not too much to ask, surely?

Last chance then I'll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the "gay erasure" argument.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Last chance then I'll correctly assume that there are no sources on there that support the "gay erasure" argument.

It won't be correct, plugging your ears, And closing your eyes isn't "correctly assuming"

[–] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If you can't provide a single piece of evidence to support your argument no matter how many times you're asked, it's correct to assume it doesn't exist. Bye now :)

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 0 points 22 hours ago

If you can't be bothered to look at the evidence provided then, no its not correct to assume it doesn't exist lol.