this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
100 points (95.5% liked)

Technology

2597 readers
619 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Coming to a website near you this summer: the European Commission is close to a ‘solution’ that could force people to use their government-issued ID to get online. EDRi and EFF’s concerns about threats to everyone’s privacy and data protection, a chilling effect on access to information, and digital exclusion – harming the already most marginalised in society - remain unsolved.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't notice there to be less hate in spaces mostly without anonymity, or less false bravery.

However, being "anonymous", but identifiable with some work is still better than being identifiable immediately.

It's the opposite of security, people create tools to have perfect forward secrecy, ephemeral keys, deniability - all for good reasons, now someone wants put a metaphorical gun to everyone's heads telling we'll be safer.

It's really better to not say anything approving in that direction. Every word matters.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I preferred the pre-tech "phonebook" stage where all you had was your name (and whatever else was attached to it based on one's own behaviour).

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

But that's also what we had in early 00s. A bunch of emails, a bunch of ICQ numbers, other such things, but ultimately your only persona to contact with others was your real one.