this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
925 points (97.8% liked)

Games

38439 readers
1551 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Dremor@lemmy.world
925
Palworld confirms ‘disappointing’ game changes forced by Pokémon lawsuit (www.videogameschronicle.com)
submitted 2 days ago by simple@lemm.ee to c/games@lemmy.world
251 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

With the implementation of Patch v0.5.5 this week, we must make yet another compromise. From this patch onward, gliding will be performed using a glider rather than with Pals. Pals in the player’s team will still provide passive buffs to gliding, but players will now need to have a glider in their inventory in order to glide.

How lame. Japan needs to fix its patent laws, it's ridiculous Nintendo owns the simple concept of using an animal to fly.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nintendo shouldn't be trying to own mechanics. if someone took their core idea and made it so good people who are Pokemon fans are buying it en masse then maybe they should take a hint and make a game that people want. but instead they're out there suing devs for "stealing" their idea of holding onto the feet of creatures with wings to glide? they're clearly unable to take down the game and decided to blindly keep stabbing away at random things trying to bankrupt them with trivial lawsuits. it's pathetic

[–] mhague@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

Does your comment make sense as a response to my comment?

I'm confused why the devs stuck their head in the jaws of a sue happy monster. I ask, "But what was the point? What did they plan to happen?"

And you tell me Nintendo shouldn't own mechanics? Like... I know that. I am so used to people misunderstanding me, that I specifically go back and add a huge banner saying "I agree with you." I can call Nintendo assholes, call copyright broken, paint the devs as good but naive, and I still get "listen here, Nintendo is bad. Copyright is broken."