Technology

69947 readers

2260 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

930

Paul McCartney and Dua Lipa urge UK Prime Minister to rethink his AI copyright plans. A new law could soon allow AI companies to use copyrighted material without permission. (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by dwazou@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

313 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

            
              There’s a practical concern: how do you prevent ai without preventing people.
What if you want to allow search, and how is that different than ai, legally or in practice?
Does this put Reddit in a new light?  Free content to users but charging for the api to do bulk download such as for ai?

[–] bufalo1973@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Search is very different to create something.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

In this context they’re identical - some automated process looking at all your content. While some of these agents may be honest, there’s no real distinction from search or ai or archive.