this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
111 points (89.4% liked)

FediLore + Fedidrama

2860 readers
141 users here now

Rules

  1. Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
  2. When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
  3. The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.

The usual instance-wide rules also apply.


Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)

Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.

Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc

(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama

Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse

Partners:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I've only ever seen one comment from nutomic cited as evidence of transphobia. And its a DM responding to some mystery comment that is never posted alongside it. A bit suspicious when the only evidence is presented without context.

Though it does contain the transphobic dogwhistle, "biological man," but that term is also one a reasonable person could reasonably reach from a place of ignorance. He also admitted to knowing very little about trans issues.

Also the trans comments are just one in a list of things. Without context there's no way to know if those even are his own ideas, or a summery of the mystery comment he's responding to, but also clearly disagrees with.

The opposition to nutomic on the basis of transphobia feels very much like a witch hunt. This doesn't seem like strongly held anti-trans beliefs. People are occasionally wrong or misinformed about things. And that's okay!

Edit: misremembered the specific language in the quote

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks so much for posting this. Since you're clearly more familiar with nutomic, and this conversation do you think my assessment is off base?

This context doesn't change my conclusion, but I'm clearly a prime target for confirmation bias as I made up my mind before seeing it.

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

nutomic is clearly not transphobic

I’m not either, and got censored big time

People act like "snowflakes" when it comes to certain subjects and jump to conclusions full of wrong assumptions. Even though I hate this term, I feel like it’s the accurate one.

Remember: if you don’t know, you’re a transphobe. If you don’t act, you’re a transphobe. If you’re wrong and are willing to learn, you’re still a transphobe and you’ll always be. at some point if you exist, you’re transphobic. - same issue applies for many other things. People love talking shit and their words often have no real meaning or base

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago

Nutomic is banned from blahaj anyway.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He hasn't apologised. If he knew very little about trans people back then, that's bad, because he's a socialist and should be educating himself on the whole sphere of leftism. But refusing to apologise after all this criticism, all the dozens of people who've asked him to apologise to his face? That means he's really truly thought about the issue, and he isn't ashamed of his comment.

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

He has, on the lemmy.ml post

Apologizing to blahaj is something I don’t wish to my worse enemy. Blahaj is joining the lemmygrad and hexbear category for me