this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
41 points (80.6% liked)

Videos

16005 readers
193 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like to get a lot of young people into it, it doesn't just need pay, but also some of the comforts of other jobs. As in: if I can work from home vs going into a workshop from 9-5 5 days a week, even if I'd be paid more I'd prefer to work from home. Other jobs can offer perks like that, but for a lot of manufacturing jobs that's clearly not an option- so many reduced working hours/days would work. But I think when there's already a shortage on employees, companies don't want to also cut down on the hours they're working.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That's kind of a pipe dream.

The reality of manufacturing is that unless people are physically in the building, the business isn't making money. Tool and die is largely a support role. We're not just making the tooling, we're making sure the press is still running all day.

That means that if the machine is running, we have to be here. The machine has to run frequently to make sense. They're simply aren't enough people for a 4 shift rotation, which is what we'd need to have reduced hours. We struggle to fill 2. Right now we're running 3 maintenance shifts and 2 production, and that's more than most manufacturers near me can handle. The labor just isn't there. We've tried 4x10 shifts and that's difficult to sell to 2nd and 3rd shifters. About half of first shift couldn't make it work. But it didn't really matter, ultimately.

The reality is that most of the building is working 5 ten hour shifts and a 6 hour Saturday for the foreseeable future. Could we attract young people with fewer hours? Maybe. It's manufacturing and it's a hard sell regardless. I love my job, I work with a lot of people who love their jobs, and that includes guys on the floor who do little more than plug parts in to machines. It can be immensely satisfying work, but it's hard, dirty, and loud. Ask 50 teenagers if they'd rather stand next to a punch press every day or throw burgers out of windows through college, 49 are gonna throw burgers.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like people need to take an interest and the only way to do that is make them happy or make them money. Paying more will put bodies at stations and make them want to be on-site for as long as they get paid. The rest is people management.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 3 points 13 hours ago

And, don't forget the magic word: unionize.