this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
197 points (95.4% liked)
HistoryPorn
6931 readers
12 users here now
If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.
HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
- No genocide or atrocity denialism.
Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts
Illustrations and paintings should go to History Illustrations
Related Communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Isn't presuming every photo like this as gay almost as bad as presuming there were no gays in history?
Lots of friends have fun and take photos like this. I have photos with friends where we look at each other like this. One could be more masculine or dominant and they're in love. They might also be playing dress up and having fun. Who knows unless someone has documented history here.
I'm just saying that while I usually love the "they were just roommates" mockery and acknowledging clearly LGBTQIA+ situations overlooked in history, I also feel like assuming it's always a gay situation is potentially as bad. Forcing a narrative rather than saying we aren't sure.
I appreciate OP saying "potentially."
I mean I would have agreed with you except, as you mentioned, OP said "potentially," so that kind of invalidates your entire point, even if other people engage in this kind of behaviour.
I was more remarking about other comments I saw here before I commented. And it's a trend I see basically every time this kind of thing is posted online.
I agree it's a trend, but it's a bit disingenuous to complain about that trend when by your own admission the OP included the word "potentially"