this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
410 points (88.8% liked)

Technology

71884 readers
4645 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A growing network of online communities known collectively as the “manosphere” is emerging as a serious threat to gender equality, as toxic digital spaces increasingly influence real-world attitudes, behaviours, and policies, the UN agency dedicated to ending gender discrimination has warned.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

To paraphrase Jon Lovett, they have "back of the classroom energy" while the left has "front of the classroom energy".

"Teacher teacher, he said something some people might find offensive! Send him to the principal's office"

"Thanks for narcing me out, r****d"

"Teacher teacher, he just said the r-word!"

The left just isn't equipped to deal with the manosphere. Everything the left does just makes the manosphere seem even more cool to the kids.

"The UN is worried about these guys, they must be really badass!"

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Wat?

The manosphere is literally a bunch of losers that can't get laid and are making excuses for it.

Work out. Have a career. Don't be a asshole. Do that and you can get laid but that's too hard for some folks.

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

That's kind of the thing, we want to think they're a bunch of sexless losers, but the basic tenets of advice you get from the manosphere will probably get you laid if you follow it. Following manosphere advice works because it's the exact same advice you just laid out but packaged in a more attractive and focused manner. It just happens to be with a side of right wing politics and more than a bit of misogyny.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

Oh, finally. The sexless/incels is a tiny part of the manosphere. We see them because we want to. You don't need to respect women in order to get affection, you need it to build love and trust

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago

Right, listen to that manosophere and you can commit some R or SA ... Is that what you mean by "get laid"?

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

They're groomed from a young age by the manosphere to be losers that can't get laid, so they'll continuously buy self-help books from the manosphere.

They still vote though. And this all happens because to a teenager, the manosphere are the cool guys making fun of the whiny nerds.

[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

There no way Andrew Tate is cool at a party.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Kids in my daughters class did a project about 'an issue that is important to you'. They could pick anything.

Most of the kids talked about interesting and positive fields like environmental protection/space exploitation or some sport they love to participate in. Three of the boys chose to talk about 'men's rights', and according to the teacher who I spoke to about it afterwards they were echoing Andrew Tate shit.

They were 10 years old at the time.

None of their parents are divorced either, so theres no 'woe story' from dad in the background to put any framing around this.

However, their parents are all conservative and all let their kids access Youtube with no oversight. So social media and lax/indifferent parenting are very much grooming the next generation into hateful misogynists like Tate.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 2 days ago

No only in a podcast of his environment with slave girls that are punished if they don't agree

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Malek061@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just because the youtube algorithm promotes outrage doesn't make it right.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Obviously... but kids aren't going to stop watching because of some tut tuts and wags of the finger. That just makes them like it more.

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Yes. Correct. But talk to a boy in Jr. High. They aren't as smart about this as you might hope.