this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
713 points (94.5% liked)

Murdered by Words

2125 readers
1 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] riverSpirit@thelemmy.club 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Look at the people around, do any of them look like they approve this?

Just because no one wants to risk getting involved with a psycho, when statistically the abused will side with the abuser in such a situation against you, does not mean society accepts it.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 6 days ago

I mean, when the woman was the victim, they got together and helped her deal with it. When the man was the victim, they either ignored it or in a few cases were caught by the camera smiling at what was happening.

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If you've ever been the victim of bullying you should already know that bystanders, by not stopping the perpetrators, implicitly validate it. That's how the perpetrators continue.

If you have not been a victim of public harrassment, kindly, stfu.

[–] riverSpirit@thelemmy.club -1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Don’t you dare demand the public step in to risk their life when you won’t even leave a relationship.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Ooh spicy take

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 6 days ago

I'm not demanding anything, I'm countering your point that silent disapproval means that it's shunned upon. It's not. I'm not blaming anyone for not stepping in, I've also not stepped in several times, but be aware that that's enabling.

"Society is against this kind of behaviour" no it isn't, it fucking isn't. Sometimes individuals have good reasons, whatever, but the conclusion is that abusers feel enabled. And I'm not even touching the disparity between genders in these situations.