this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
761 points (99.5% liked)

politics

24561 readers
2880 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Move comes after rightwing Republican accuses New York City mayoral candidate of concealing support for ‘terrorism’

The Trump administration has raised the possibility of stripping Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic mayoral candidate for New York City, of his US citizenship as part of a crackdown against foreign-born citizens convicted of certain offences.

Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, appeared to pave the way for an investigation into Mamdani’s status after Andy Ogles, a rightwing Republican representative for Tennessee, called for his citizenship to be revoked on the grounds that he may have concealed his support for “terrorism” during the naturalization process.

Mamdani, 33, who was born in Uganda to ethnic Indian parents, became a US citizen in 2018 and has attracted widespread media attention – and controversy – over his vocal support for Palestinian rights.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 134 points 2 days ago (21 children)

Hey USA, you guys ok down there?

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 154 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Naw man, we’re pretty fucking far from ok

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We need some cold pipe hittin niggas to deal with the felon in chief.

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

If only Marcellus Wallace was real

[–] moncharleskey@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 days ago

Zed's dead baby, Zed's dead.

[–] FartMaster69@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 2 days ago

No, send help.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I'm stocking up on ammunition in case I need it for self-defense and using a no-log VPN when criticizing the government.

So I'm gonna go with "No."

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

fyi there is no such thing as a no log vpn; be careful out there.

also look into reloading. it’s not only economical but nerdy fun too.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

fyi there is no such thing as a no log vpn; be careful out there.

TailsOS has entered the chat

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

It's an instrument, not a solution. In general I'd advise everyone to think of security thus:

If someone wants to find your ass, they'll find your ass.

But if you follow all the best practices, they won't find your ass accidentally or just for fun. They'll have to work.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago
[–] flandish@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Try looking up something your gov does not like.

just remember, vpn is a camo, not a security product and be safe. tor, other computers, etc.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Jesus. I’m sorry to hear my friend.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Started reading this as "stacking up animation" and thought you are going for inner escapism with your anime collection when there'll be problems with interwebs, interpipes and intergunshots on the streets.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In no way, shape, or fucking form nor by any conceivable (or even inconceivable) stretch of even the fucking wildest of imaginations.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the most accurate no I've ever read in my life.

[–] don@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago
[–] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago

Not fucking at all.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

No we're pretty fucking far from ok.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

No, we're about as far from OK as a country can get. The world needs to unite against us and muster the largest liberation force ever seen. And I mean the entire world literally every nation that can send warriors, send them. Germans, you have been where we are. You know, all too well, where this road leads. You could not turn yourselves back from it, and so you needed the help of 4 allied world powers. Now, one of those world powers is trudging down that same road you walked almost a century ago. And, I don't think we will be able to turn ourselves back, just as you could not.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, no, clean up your own mess. We have better things to do than rescue you from a mess you got yourselves into.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Is that what we said to you when it happened to you?

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

You mean WW2? I don't know if US propaganda covers this, but Europe was fighting the Nazis for like a year or two before the US entered. As I recall, you guys were staying out of it, with an isolationist stance, until you were attacked by the Japanese.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

But could Germany have ever turned back from fascism on its own, without any help whatsoever? Let's say the entire continent just let the Nazis have their way and let Carl Schmitt and Leo Strauss play out their experimental new form of government out to its horrible logical conclusion. Could Germany ever come back from that? Could the world?

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The world, yes. Germany, probably not. As the citizens got increasingly fed up with their governments antics, there would have been revolts and protests. These are Germans, not Americans, they hadn't been propagandized into submission beforehand.

[–] AutistoMephisto@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

True, but they had been riding a wave of Pan-Germanism prior to the Nazis. Germany had many diverse regions that didn't see each other as equals prior to the Weimar Republic.

[–] Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Germans, you have been where we are. You know, all too well, where this road leads.

Nope. Germans will not help. They have seen where this road leads, and they've decided that they must never do anything military again. They prefer allowing all of the rest of the world to turn 100 % fascist over doing one single small thing that somehow hints towards militarism. Germans allow the road to lead where it leads, as long as that does not happen in Germany.

Also, for the same reason, in Germany it is extremely impolite calling someone a nazi. As long as they aren't openly showing a swastika or publicly calling for a genocide with that specific word, or lifting their arm in the specific way done by Germans in 1930's and 1940's, they are allowed to do what they do. If you call someone a nazi, you are comparing their acts to what Germany did in 1940's, and it's considered a grave insult towards the victims of those times. It is not acceptable in Germany to say to someone is behaving just like a nazi, and therefore, it is de facto not acceptable calling out a nazi.

Germany is the last country you can expect to stand up against nazis, precisely because they're so traumatized by their own past. It's also why I expect Germany to eventually fall under a nazi rule again some day. When you cannot talk about a danger, you cannot stop it.

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Well said. I think the rest of the world has a pretty vested interest in the US not going completely off the rails, even if we don't deserve the help after all the imperialist bullshit.

[–] jjagaimo@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

For anyone in France, we might need some help

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Probably shouldn’t have made all those white flag jokes huh?

[–] don@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

Grandfather fought in WWII and had nothing but kind words for the people of France. Never could understand the fuckery of those jokes, which is probably for the better.

That was just the stupid Americans... nevermind. We deserve that.

[–] MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No, but all the conservative evangelical "but suffering brings us closer to God" waste of space type people that want to live in the 1940s sure are having a hell of a hurrah though.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago

No, but if we could hang on for another year or so while I prepare to move that'd be great.

[–] skeptomatic@lemmy.ca -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well, you can only trust things you read online so much, it’s always nice to hear from real people.

[–] skeptomatic@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

Didn't mean to be a dick (~narator: he did), but I mean, it's obvious.
If it's somehow eluding people though, that'd be what's fucked up.