this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2025
1243 points (99.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8387 readers
2454 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Contract yes, as it pertains to laws, but I would argue construct no- since protecting one's offspring is a natural/biological impulse. It's non negotiable from a survival viewpoint, and some people have better survival instincts than others.

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

You cannot invoke biology to generalize here. There are many mammals who use their offsprings as projectile decoys when they are in danger.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Let's not bring Elon into this.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Typically those are mammals with larger litters and shorter gestational periods. Human offspring are too resource intensive to be widely used as decoys.

This is a weird conversation.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 58 minutes ago

That's because you had a bad take that illogically separates the biological demands of organisms and their communities from aspects of social organization

There is no separation, social behaviors are also adaptations to the environment.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are homo sapiens one such mammal?

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

As long as one person in history has done it once, yes. Just because people around us doesn' do it, doesn't mean it's not "natural". I don't know how tribes with 11 disposable children behave.

We used to be night active but if you ask anyone nowadays they'd act like waking up to the sun is THE "natural" thing.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Are you suggesting that if even one human lacks this biological impulse to protect their children, we can't say that humans generally have a biological impulse to protect their children? That's absurd. And isn't this point entirely moot with regards to people who do have that in-built instinct?

[–] Potatar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm saying it is not "non negotiable".

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

We as creatures behave certain ways because of a result of biology and circumstances. How can you say anything we do isn't a natural/biological impulse. When did we stop being a part of nature? And stop being controlled by biology?