this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2025
650 points (99.5% liked)

Progressive Politics

3015 readers
522 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The Democratic Party WILL rig the general election. Hell, they’ll probably work with Republicans to get their candidate in over Mamdani.

Who owns the machines? Is the software audited? Are there tabulation servers involved?

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it have been easier to rig the primary?

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why not really? Nobody would have blinked at the results if he lost the primary. If he loses the general, especially to someone he beat in the primary, there will be a lot more attention. This is especially true with a candidate who's popularity seems to leap forward every time a poll is done.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 5 points 2 weeks ago

And the hand-count auditing of machine results for mayoral primaries is usually overseen by just a handful of people. It’s way more achievable. Tampering with those machines is easy by comparison.

IMO if the conspiracy hinges on “hacking” voting technology, it almost certainly overestimates not only their internal complexity but their role in determining election results.