this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
171 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

12611 readers
1394 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 64 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (18 children)

To be fair speed cameras are a terrible way to address the problem of speeding. The solution isn't speed limit enforcement, it is road design. If you build a wide straight open road that feels like you're driving on a highway, drivers will naturally tend to drive on it at highway speeds. Slapping a low speed limit on a road like that will make following said speed limit extremely uncomfortable and drivers will naturally tend to go too fast the moment they stop monitoring their speedometer. Hiding a speed camera on a road like that is essentially tricking people into paying an extra tax and speed cameras are often being blatantly used in that way.

The real solution to keeping speeds low is narrowing the street and also if possible making it windy. Use the space to add trees and protected bike lanes. Suddenly drivers will feel comfortable driving a slower speed without the need for a speeding camera. As a bonus it improves the safety for cyclists and pedestrians far more than a stupid speed camera ever would, and it makes the road far more enjoyable to use for everyone, including the car drivers.

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The people signing this petition are also opposed to road redesigns, particularly ones involving road diets.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is this a feeling or opinion you have, or do you have a source stating as such?

[–] highduc@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Car brainers are gonna car brain. It's always "one more lane".

[–] tyler@programming.dev 1 points 20 hours ago

I mean.. there's nuance in everything. a recent road redesign in san francisco was disliked by shop owners, and is getting removed. But they still want the bike lanes, they just didn't like how the city implemented it, because it resulted in a bunch of other problems. So if DrunkEngineer doesn't have a source for "the people signing this petition are also opposed to road redesigns" I'm going to go ahead and assume it's made up and that, just like everything, there's nuance and making up people's positions is a good way to make your position weaker.

load more comments (16 replies)