https://infosec.exchange/@winterknight1337/114906298563785317
here is the referenced article: https://www.theregister.com/2025/07/23/microsoft_copilot_vision/
this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
859 points (99.4% liked)
Microblog Memes
8779 readers
1990 users here now
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
Rules:
- Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
- Be nice.
- No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
- Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.
Related communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Windows 3.1 was fine and fast. They should have stopped there.
3.1 looked terrible.
2000 was stable and looked decent for it's time. Enjoyed the look of 10, but behind the scenes it was invasive. 11 is terrible on the looks* and the invasiveness.
*) seriously... it looks dated and cluttered after using something like Gnome for a while
2000 was amazing. Constantly rebooting was a normal thing and everyone from techs to end users was fine with it, because it was normal.
One day I was telling my bf, "This thing has been running for a month! I got 30-days uptime!"
Can someone write a 64 bit Windows for Workgroups 3.11?
https://reactos.org/ ?
Is this any good? Looks pretty neat for helping people switch
Its been in alpha since the 90s and can't run anything past vista last I checked. For most mint with wine is probably still ideal. I was just being silly and giving a genuine reply
Oh I see.Yeah, it looks a little jank lol.mint has run all my windows programs, fine
Progman.exe for the win