this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
939 points (97.6% liked)

Political Memes

9350 readers
2037 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Rooki@lemmy.world
automodbeta@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
Lasherz12@lemmy.world
FauxPseudo@lemmy.world
939
It's not theft (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 weeks ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
69 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not what happened.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Why don't you tell us what happened, then?

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Here's an article about the case in question.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

“This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta’s use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful,” Chhabria said. “It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one.”

Still quite a bullshit ruling.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Well, no. If I sue you for defamation and provide evidence that you kick puppies for fun. The ruling doesn't prove that kicking puppies for fun is ok or that you didn't commit defamation, just that I have a bad lawyer.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's still bullshit.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Would you prefer that judges rule however they prefer even with no evidence to support the ruling was presented?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'd prefer that you understood what "bullshit" means

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works -1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And I prefer that you did but alas

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"No U," eh?

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Precisely. I don't know why you expect replies above the kindergarden level when your comments are kindergarden level.