UK Politics

4200 readers

338 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Deal to get ChatGPT Plus for whole of UK discussed by Open AI boss and minister (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 days ago by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The boss of the firm behind ChatGPT and the UK technology secretary discussed a multibillion-pound deal to give the entire country premium access to the AI tool, the Guardian has learned.

Sam Altman, a co-founder of OpenAI, talked to Peter Kyle about a potential agreement to give UK residents access to its advanced product.

According to two sources with direct knowledge of the meeting, the idea was floated as part of a broader discussion in San Francisco about opportunities for collaboration between OpenAI and the UK.

Those close to the discussion say Kyle never really took the idea seriously, not least because it could have cost as much as £2bn. But the talks show the enthusiasm with which the technology secretary has embraced the artificial intelligence sector, despite concerns over the accuracy of some chatbot responses and implications for privacy and copyright.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Can we stop depending on American scraps and make our own AI monoliths.

[–] scintilla@crust.piefed.social 1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Based on everything I've heard I think your power is genuinely too expensive for it to be worth while. In the US and china power is much cheaper.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

That's easy to fix. The government just need to stop with their stupid price protection racket. Power doesn't need to cost that much, they make it cost more then strict economic forces would otherwise make it.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 3 points 3 days ago

A lot of the problem is the way electricity is priced, based on the most expensive unit, gas.

[–] tazeycrazy@feddit.uk 1 points 3 days ago

I would think that can use data centers abroad or look at more power effecent models. But that's the aim that all the ai companies have.