this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2025
112 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

2809 readers
427 users here now

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Corporate VPNs would be allowed presumably.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

doesn't look like its written that way

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Eh you made me read it now. It's not super clearly written but it does sound to me like it is only services that are designed to circumvent the moralising that are prohibited. It's a little ambiguous though.

The more interesting thing I learned from reading it is that it isn't just about banning porn. It's also about banning the depiction of trans people - even descriptions! Insane. Come on America.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah, I mean the whole point is to be able to control people. 'Design' and 'adult content' have nothing to do with it.

[–] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

"designed to" is in the text of the law. But it's not clearly written.