this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
1694 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

63746 readers
4164 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Guster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (7 children)

To be fair, the only reason why YouTube got so big and stayed relevant is THANKS to the ads. Do you think there would be incentives for creators to create good content if there wasn't as revenue?

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most of the creators have sponsored segments that's how they make money nowadays...

[–] BackStabbath@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

But not everyone does right? I feel like you have to be a fairly big/popular channel to have sponsors. I'm pretty sure smaller channels can only depend on ad revenue.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

For Raids Shadow Legends, NordVPN or things like that I don't think you need to be too big, I see some videos of channels around 50k with sponsors.

Below that number of subscribers the channel doesn't get much of ad revenue anyway, most of the money goes to google anyway.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It got big when there were no ads and nobody got paid. People made stuff for shits and giggles, and Google had infinite budget to just fund things. Then everything started to change a decade or so ago and now we've got this Like&Subscribe corponet situation everywhere.

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

This is true but I blame the economy for squeezing people into needing to monetize what used to be harmless, fun hobbies.

[–] Mandarbmax@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Why would I fuck your mom without a profit incentive?

[–] Franzia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 years ago

You're right, they took the incentive away over and over again and drove my favorite creators out. Now that the value is lower and the uncertainty is high - now they're charging a lot more for the product.

[–] exohuman@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

This! So much this! On top of that, the amount of video YouTube processes is insanely expensive. We are talking billions of views of streaming video served instantly.