this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
169 points (97.7% liked)

Canada

10528 readers
1018 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This week, Canadian airline WestJet became one of the first to try to switch the ability to recline into a paid "perk" by announcing that it was reconfiguring 43 of its Boeing 737-8 MAX and 737-800 (BA) planes to have what it classifies as a "refreshed range of seating options."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The airline industry figured out long ago that people will suffer the most miserable flights possible in order to save money but they will absolutely take free comfort upgrades. If they do this it’s to save money and make the flight cheaper because if other airlines offer reclining seats at the same price customers will take those instead as a free upgrade.

[–] Eranziel@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Please explain how this saves them money? All I see is finding ways to upcharge customers for what used to be standard options, while maybe cramming in one more row of passengers.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Cramming in one more row of passengers means you get more passengers per flight => each passenger costs less to fly.

I don’t actually know if they’re going to fit in one more row though. Maybe the non-reclining seats are lighter in weight? That would save money on fuel costs.

If the system for optional reclining seats actually adds weight to the plane then they’re taking a gamble that enough passengers will pay extra for the reclining to pay for the additional fuel costs. That could backfire!

In a lot of ways this seems like an experiment that could backfire, even if it doesn’t risk increasing flight costs on some flights. Only time will tell!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You mean "to increase profits"..

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

That’s less specific. You can increase profits by saving money (reducing costs) or you can increase profits by selling more (increasing sales).

This plan to take away reclining seats is unlikely to increase sales!