politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
What’s the “scorched earth” part of this? I read the article but I guess it went over my head.
sensationalist clickbait headline. sounds like theyre going to try and do a 'logical' defense even though it will probably be a kangaroo court whose only goal is revenge on behalf of the rapist, trump.
Likely he's going to get a conviction either way, so might as well make them fight for it and hopefully piss off people on the right for him resisting and what he's saying, and on the left for the kangaroo court.
Agreed - I certainly hope they realize there's not much to lose going 'scorched earth'. He was fbi director, he's got to have some dirt.
We should start referring to trump as a therapist.
"pre-trial motion seeking to quash the case for selective and vindictive prosecution"
+
"Another motion will be also filed challenging the legality of prosecutor Lindsay Halligan."
In other words
"Your case is invalid and the person bringing the case isn't qualified."
Ha! Using the law. Those scheming MAGAts are bound to admit defeat now!
The Daily Beast writes quite exaggerated, clickbaity headlines
Hyperbole to whitewash over the facts that Comey helped Trump get elected the first time.
Comey didn't force Clinton to ignore the rust belt and ignore the demands of voters on the fence about her. Clinton is the only person that caused Clinton to lose. And it was her pied piper strategy that resulted in billions of free advertising for Trump.
Comey's attorney told the judge he has plans to bring 4 separate motions to dismiss the case, on 4 separate grounds.
I was surprised he didn't move to dismiss right there at the arraignment for failure to state an offense.
The prosecutors said they have a bunch of classified evidence they have to sort through. The judge did not like that. There's no reason for anything to be classified in this case. Comey's alleged lie was in public to Congress on CSPAN. And he was talking about unclassified stuff.
So this classified documents stuff seems to be a delaying tactic, because these guys have no idea what they're going to do with discovery. And I've heard that eastern district of VA is called the "rocket docket" because the judges like to move fast. They don't like delays.
I think it's this? Not positive. It might be that they haven't been told what they're charged with too.
fucking Daily beat off.