this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
279 points (97.3% liked)

Open Source

41697 readers
135 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] doeknius_gloek@discuss.tchncs.de 52 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

I've always had a weird feeling about FUTO, but I thought them giving money to open source projects can't be that bad. Now I hope they don't fuck up Immich.

[–] ShortN0te@lemmy.ml 26 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Luckily thanks to their licensing model they basically cannot. Immich has according to github as of now 1606 contributors. Changing the license so that there could even be a proprietary fork would require basically the ok by every contributor (that made a relevant code contribution)

[–] Ferk@lemmy.ml 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

And even if they did somehow manage to get permission to switch the license, all previous versions would still be open in perpetuity so a fork would come easily. Immich source isn't only open, and not only GPL.. but AGPL-3.0 which is as copyleft as you can get.

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 14 points 5 days ago

Thank God! That's a relief. I thought I was going to have to redo my entire photo library hosting stuff.

[–] beyond@linkage.ds8.zone 5 points 5 days ago

FUTO has always been sus, but privacy redditors gave them a pass because of Rossmann's involvement.