this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
723 points (98.5% liked)

Not The Onion

18428 readers
1888 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

For a General Strike to work, there does need to be a somewhat unified vision of what the strike is against. That means getting workers educated about the situation as much as possible.

A boycott can sometimes work against individual corporations, but a boycott to make the government listen would require sustained participation from a massive section of the population, which seems unlikely to say the least. In contrast, a general strike only needs workers in critical unionized industries to join in to cause a virtual halt of economic activity (dock workers, train workers, truckers, etc). This lowers the numbers needed to be effective by an order of magnitude, and is thus much more feasible. History has shown it to be the most effective non-violent tool we have for over 100 years, and so far nothing else has come close.

Prefiguration could be considered a 3rd method. Building the alternative systems we want to see and use in the world to lower our dependence on the current system facilitates the ability to enact general strikes, boycotts, and reduces the leverage they have over us to not enact resistance.

A fourth method would be perhaps more extreme, like collectively destroying all of the world's databases that contain financial debt records, Fightclub/Mr.Robot style. But that would require extreme coordination between established capable groups, and currently is not a feasible option.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

In contrast, a general strike only needs workers in critical unionized industries to join in to cause a virtual halt of economic activity

There's no requirement that they be unionized. Anyway, that's unrealistic in the US.

History has shown it to be the most effective non-violent tool we have for over 100 years

Keep in mind that previous effective broadly-based strikes have not always been entirely nonviolent. Scabs are not always treated all that nicely, and neither are the police and private-sector goons who are sent in to beat down the strikers. During the most effective period of strike power being used, there were also attacks on assets and occasionally individuals. Non-violence is good, but there are some necessary conditions for it to be effective. And one big one is that the media cannot be controlled by the current ruling elite. Without that, there's no way for mass action to sway public opinion.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 hours ago

There’s no requirement that they be unionized. Anyway, that’s unrealistic in the US.

It helps, because unions will have strike funds to supplement worker's income during the strike. Most American's have no savings and are living hand to mouth, which may discourage them from participating in a general strike.

For your second paragraph, I don't disagree. Even with the potential for that, I consider it a mostly non-violent action, at least in comparison to a civil war.