this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
413 points (96.2% liked)
People Twitter
8434 readers
969 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There's no date bracketing, but Wikipedia's list of lists of misconceptions is excellent and often covers things taught in some schools, e.g.
Relevant XKCD.
Ever since I read that, I try to review that page every few years and there's always something I am wrong about. It's fantastic!
How does it predate her reign? Most wrong quotes come after the alleged author's death
I already provided the link for you to check this, but it's on the history list, under "Early Modern".
The citation is this HowStuffWorks page.
This does not answer your question at all, but your confusion reminded me of this, which you might find amusing
https://youtu.be/FvfoS9tGYCU&t=550
I've always thought that (dynamic?) stretching helps prevent or minimizes the chance of injury, but after reading this, I did a quick internet search, and there doesn't seem to be that much evidence to support it. It just depends on other factors, I guess?
This is possibly the greatest Wikipedia article to ever exist.
As a pedant, that's my favorite page on Wikipedia
Yup, regarding flat earth, people saw the mast coming over the horizon before the ship. They could also see the very globe-like moon in the sky.
Only idiots thought the world was flat.
Apes being monkeys scientifically is the best news I've heard all year. It has been a banable offense in my home for years to correct someone for saying monkey when referring to gorillas, orangutans, etc., despite the fact that I genuinely thought scientists did not classify them as such.
Monge.
I think it's still useful to have informal words that distinguish smaller, typically less intelligent primates from larger and typically smarter ones, but I agree that using it as a gotcha is pointless.
It's like people using the botanical distinction about berries, legumes, etc to argue that some savory plant part isn't a vegetable (e.g. tomatoes as fruits, bananas as berries, etc). What's scientifically correct comes second to clear mutual communication, and no one likes a smart-ass.
Besides, we as mammals are really just all confused fish.
Return to monkee