science

22237 readers

719 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

m3t00@lemmy.world

Joleee@lemmy.world

laverabe@lemmy.world

DeadPand@midwest.social

laverabe@lemmy.zip

201

AI sycophancy (excessively agreeing with user) is pervasive and harmful for people who seek advice from AIs (arxiv.org)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by zlatiah@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world

14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Relatively new arXiv preprint that got featured on Nature News, I slightly adjusted the title to be less technical. The discovery was done using aggregated online Q&A... one of the funnier sources being 2000 popular questions from r/AmITheAsshole that were rated YTA by the most upvoted response. Study seems robust, and they even did several-hundred participants trials with real humans.

A separate preprint measured sycophancy across various LLMs in a math competition-context (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2510.04721), where apparently GPT-5 was the least sycophantic (+29.0), and DeepSeek-V3.1 was the most (+70.2)

The Nature News report (which I find a bit too biased towards researchers): https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-03390-0

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Can you put capitalism in there too as this describes the same thing?

Find it hilarious that this study is like: "Telling people yes makes them addicted to hearing it"

When it's literally the reason every billionaire is a sociopath. Everyone tells them yes, because they have all the money, and it makes them think they're great. So they aquire more money.

So of course they invented AI to work the same way.