this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
180 points (100.0% liked)

Science

14000 readers
26 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
alyaza@beehaw.org
Gaywallet@beehaw.org
remington@beehaw.org
180
In a First, Wind and Solar Generated More Power Than Coal in U.S. (www.scientificamerican.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by NiklzNDimz@beehaw.org to c/science@beehaw.org
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

"Wind and solar produced more U.S. power than coal during the first five months of this year, as several coal plants closed and gas prices dropped"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jo@readit.buzz 1 points 2 years ago

How hydrogen is transforming these tiny Scottish islands

Scotland’s Orkney Islands produce more clean energy than their inhabitants can use. Their next step? Hydrogen.

Hydrogen is not free of problems: it degrades metal, leaks above a very low level have the potential to negate the environmental benefits, and it's not particularly efficient because of the cost of compression. And Green hydrogen (which is more like a battery than a fuel) risks providing Big Carbon with a new excuse to pollute with their multi-coloured array of non-Green hydrogens (which are filthy fuels, nothing like a battery).

But I'm not at all convinced about nuclear providing better answers than renewables. It takes decades for a new nuclear plant to come online, the same money invested in renewables starts yielding benefits immediately. And the problem of disposing of nuclear waste is not yet solved.