this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

World News

9 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

founded 2 years ago
 

The row centres around the exhibition 'This is Colonialism' and the museum's decision to restrict white people from entering a small section of the display

Police officers are gathered in front of the Zeche Zollern museum in Dortmund, the focus of what social networks are describing as a racism scandal.

The row centres around the exhibition 'This is Colonialism' and the museum's decision to restrict white people from entering a small section of the display. For several months now, Saturdays at the museum have been reserved for black people and people of colour to explore a colonialism exhibition

The museum claims the objective is not to be discriminatory, but to reserve a safe space for reflection for non-whites.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

You claimed they're equally applicable right here, dickhead:

'Equally applicable' is not 'equally bad'. Jesus Christ, I can't believe I have to explain this to another human being. It is equally applicable to argue that a principle regarding the sanctity of human life renders the murder of one person and the murder of a million bad - they spring from the same principle. But they're not 'equally bad', the principle is 'equally applicable' ie they are both bad, not that they are both equally bad.

For fuck's sake.

If someone was racist against white people AND East Asians, and decided, on those principles, to beat me to a pulp in a back alley and call me racial slurs, that would be bad, because unprovoked violence and racism are both bad. That doesn't make it equally bad as the fucking totality of 19th century colonialism, even though 19th century colonialism is bad based on those principles. as well

[–] darq@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

'Equally applicable' is not 'equally bad'. Jesus Christ, I can't believe I have to explain this to another human being.

Oh sod right off.

If you know they're not equally bad, then you understand they're different because of context.

So you asking me:

So you would regard this argument as likewise applicable to whites-only events, right?

Is not only an obvious "gotcha" but you know it's an obvious "gotcha".

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Oh sod right off.

If you know they're not equally bad, then you understand they're different because of context.

'Different' does not mean 'not bad'. "This is bad" does not mean "This is as bad as all other crimes of this principle", it means "this is bad".

Is not only an obvious "gotcha" but you know it's an obvious "gotcha".

In what fucking way is asking you to acknowledge that racial exclusion is, at its core, bad, a 'gotcha'?