this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
20 points (100.0% liked)

Chat

7572 readers
5 users here now

Relaxed section for discussion and debate that doesn't fit anywhere else. Whether it's advice, how your week is going, a link that's at the back of your mind, or something like that, it can likely go here.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I don't think there will be one. We're extremely close to taking control of our genes in a very direct way, why would we continue leaving it up to nature?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also, there's just really no longer any natural selection in humans. Basically all of us last through breeding years now. So other than selecting out acute health issues and normal mate selection, there's not much going on.

[–] liv@beehaw.org 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's about to reverse though. I think during the climate apocalypse, eventually humans will no longer have access to things like vision correction, wheelchairs, antibiotics and other medicines, surgeries, etc. They will also be dealing with lower nutrient intakes.

[–] Butterbee@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

Well I hope we can engineer better spines because it makes no sense for our brains to just finish developing a few years before our backs give out

[–] MildlyArdvark 2 points 2 years ago

What makes you think taking control of our genes is somehow not part of our evolution?