this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
304 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

65819 readers
4972 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
304
Hikers rescued after following non-existent trail on Google Maps (www.smh.com.au)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hikers rescued after following non-existent trail on Google Maps::It was unclear how the trail in British Columbia had appeared on Google Maps in the first place.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mob@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, the proposal would just to make it more difficult to access trail maps? Seems like that wouldn't be advantageous in scenarios like mine.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't what country you're in but in the US it's not a proposal. They absolutely have these maps available for free online and at visitor/ranger stations.

[–] mob@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but the original comment was talking about getting rid of accessibility to those trail maps/gps

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I see. Yeah I don't think that's a good idea.