this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

19240 readers
2 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml
2
Should separate instances of Lemmy be topic-based? What else, if not? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 years ago by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I suppose this may make sense in the case of something like Mastodon. But something as versatile and customizable as lemmy, which allows for the existence of separate topic-based communities, makes topic-based instances of lemmy not necessary.

Instead of making a new instance for a certain topic, it is usually a much better approach to just create a new community on my current lemmy instance. At least from my perspective as a user.

I find the only exception to this is censorship and moderation. If I, for any reason am unhappy with an instance's moderation and censorship, then that is the only potential reason I can see to change and make my own.

What does everyone else think of this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

I don't think that there are islands on the fediverse. Yes, some servers block very liberally, but If their admins choose it this way, aren't they free to do so?

Most servers only block a few troll, Nazi and pedo servers and that's it.

I think that it's only fair that the people providing the service are those who get to shape the content that their server provides.

Who is unfairly blocked in your opinion? Do you have an example?