this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
41 points (95.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

31247 readers
457 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted, clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts: 1

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
    • If you feel strongly that you want politics back, please volunteer as a mod.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
vatlark@lemmy.world
forkball@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
SuperEars@lemmy.world
41
If wetness is the property of having water on something, what is the property of something in water? (lemmy.world)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by rockSlayer@lemmy.world to c/showerthoughts@lemmy.world
40 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm firmly on the side of "water is not wet" in this debate, but it's a question that I was asked while I was high and have no answer to it. Water cannot itself be wet because you can't get water on water. However, what is a fish in a lake? It can't be wet until it's taken out of the water, but it's not dry either. Is it something else?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kissaki@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Water cannot itself be wet because you can’t get water on water.

I disagree with this assessment.

Water itself is wet. It's an inherent property.

Water on water changes nothing. It's still wet.

Water is a liquid. Water on something not wet makes it wet - through wet water attachment. It's wet as long as it has water attached.

Something not wet submerged in water consequently must be wet. Although it's not particularly verifyable due to its submerged nature. You touching it means also touching all the water around it. But I don't see how it's wet property would be different from it with only a little water on it.

Thinking of a sponge - it will take in water and be considered wet. This also is the case in water. It won't stay indistinguishable.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Water itself cannot be wet, because wetness is a property applied to something that has gotten water on it. Water can neither be wet or dry, because those properties require the presence (or lack thereof) of water on something that itself is not water. When swimming, you don't feel wet until you're no longer in the water. That's because there is an equal amount of water to skin on your body; (thanks to others for helping me) you're immersed in water. Describing water as wet is like describing oil as "covered in oil".