1238
Biden calls for supreme court reforms including 18-year justice term limits
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
1238 points (99.7% liked)
News
25461 readers
4105 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If Biden were a strong leader, he could challenge his party and his followers to do the hard things. He could make a persuasive argument, rally the masses, and convince people that it is in their best interest to do what he wants to do. A strong leader would do the right thing, even if they might lose.
It's much easier to motivate your followers if they are all narcissistic bigots, of course.
It takes 2/3rd’s of Congress to pass an amendment so no he can’t make his party do it. He’d have to convince about 1/3rd of the GQP to do it too. Remember this is the party that stole 2 seats and just finished successfully weaponizing the courts to push their policy agenda as the out party. You think a single one of them wants to term limit boofer or the handmaid?
Or he can somehow as president spend all his political capital not doing president things and instead push it at the ballot level state by state, which if he was lucky would’ve taken likely his entire term. He also inherited the Covid economy with the Delta variant ripping through the country the moment he took office so “SCOTUS term limits” wasn’t exactly being prioritized over, quite literally, millions dying.
I am very critical of Biden but sometimes y’all have the most ridiculous suggestions for what he should’ve spent his time doing that shows very little grasp of what the executive branch actually can and can’t do, both technically or practically speaking.
I don't expect him to win every fight. I'm really fucking tired of hearing about how we can't be fighting battles because we'll lose. The point is to engage in the debate. You're not going to convince your enemy, but you can drain their public support and bolster your own. So many progressive oolicies have languished in the Democrat doldrums of "We don't have a super-majority so we're not even going to try" for decades.
Yet people get mad at him for constantly trying to fight to relieve student loan debt “because clearly it won’t pass.” You can’t make everyone happy. I personally prefer fights that can at least move the ball. A clearly doomed attempt at an amendment would only set things back.
It took ~15 years for the democrats to get a crack at healthcare again because of the damage the right wrought attacking Hillary Clinton’s efforts in the 90’s. And even with overwhelming dominance of the government they barely passed a very diluted bill that basically cost Obama the rest of his term and his second one. You have to think strategically sometimes. Burning political capital on a clearly doomed effort is not smart.
There was no path to victory for an amendment limiting justices’s terms in 2020. Especially not with COVID going on.
I'm not mad at him for that. I'm mad at him for not pushing on climate change, or income inequality, or corporate real estate monopolies, or any number of other issues on which Biden and the Democrats have been slow walking half measure platitudes.
Then why did we waste time discussing SCOTUS for several lengthy comments as if you cared about it? It was the context of the post and this thread.
Later dude
Because that's not the entire list of available options. It's not like the resolute desk has a box with two buttons, one labeled "Constitutional amendment to overhaul the SCOTUS," and the other is "sit on your own thumb and spin for three years." There have been many opportunities for Biden to step up and lead, and he hasn't, because he ain't that guy. He's not a leader. He was in the good chair at the right time, so the DNC decided he was the guy they wanted to take on Trump. I'm happy Trump lost to Biden, and I desperately want Harris to win. But neither of them are progressive enough to save the world or America from the looming catastrophes.
The post and thread is about term limits on SCOTUS.
It's about judicial reform. There are a lot of options besides term limits.