this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
71 points (85.9% liked)

Superbowl

3756 readers
188 users here now

For owls that are superb.

US Wild Animal Rescue Database: Animal Help Now

International Wildlife Rescues: RescueShelter.com

Australia Rescue Help: WIRES

Germany-Austria-Switzerland-Italy Wild Bird Rescue: wildvogelhilfe.org

If you find an injured owl:

Note your exact location so the owl can be released back where it came from. Contact a licensed wildlife rehabilitation specialist to get correct advice and immediate assistance.

Minimize stress for the owl. If you can catch it, toss a towel or sweater over it and get it in a cardboard box or pet carrier. It should have room to be comfortable but not so much it can panic and injure itself. If you can’t catch it, keep people and animals away until help can come.

Do not give food or water! If you feed them the wrong thing or give them water improperly, you can accidentally kill them. It can also cause problems if they require anesthesia once help arrives, complicating procedures and costing valuable time.

If it is a baby owl, and it looks safe and uninjured, leave it be. Time on the ground is part of their growing up. They can fly to some extent and climb trees. If animals or people are nearby, put it up on a branch so it’s safe. If it’s injured, follow the above advice.

For more detailed help, see the OwlPages Rescue page.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lol...it hit me square in the teeth the other day, so I just HAD to try my hand. 😂

all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sergio@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago

I'd rather see a Funkadelic of owls...

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Birds...owls...

Powlament?

Does it involve a play on the words cloaca or nictitating membrane? More like...nictitating NO brains, am I right?

In short, the owl glossary didn't help.

EDIT:

I FIGURED IT OUT. I'm such a fucking idiot.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Okay I give up. Someone spoil me.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] sxan@midwest.social 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Huh. There are some humans (non-owls) in there, so I thought the joke had something to do with them.

AI spoils my fun. Again.

[–] Okokimup@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Oh, I thought it was kind of a Hoos Hoo of government.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

yay! I got it! I just wasn't sure I got it until somebody said it explicitly 😅

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think most of the planet would like to see a multitude of crows in the oval office.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Now this is subtlety! 😉

[–] DigitalDruid@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 week ago

dirt_owl is the superb owl this is easy

[–] ik5pvx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Owldeeeeeer!

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think this is subtle?

spoilerWhat an interesting group

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Now would you even say... legislative...?

[–] vfsh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Ahahaha I only know this because I had to google it for a joke at work yesterday

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The level of sloppiness of this AI slop is especially high

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

For sure! But the only reason I prodded the AI forward in such a way was to produce a silly joke. For a silly reason. For a well-known reason!

Or not...?

[–] Elevator7009sAlt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

On one hand I do appreciate you posting on the Fediverse and supplying a nice joke for us, on another, AI… it's not exactly popular here and I can understand why. I think you might have posted something about that in Fedigrow before?

You might want to at least label this image as AI-generated. Obviously I know this is not a real picture, people don't walk around with owl heads instead of person heads, but I'm one of those folk still really easily fooled by AI images and without people in the comments talking about it I definitely would have thought some artist made this.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nope, not me. Check my history to see my business...

[–] Elevator7009sAlt@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll take your word for it. Checking history always makes me feel somehow creepy, and if I do not suspect you of purposeful bad-faith engagement (then I'd want to see what the rest of your engagement looks like so I could judge if it is a bad-faith post) I have no reason to bother. Sorry for the mixup!

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Okay, thanks for explaining.

As has happened before, I'm frankly a bit grouchy upon criticism of my AI-aided content. I do feel the post as it stands is relevant to this sub, as it's based on a real phenomenon (the definition of a group of owls) applied to a famous place which bears that definition, and then populated by the actual subjects of this sublemmy. In short, it's a simple joke / riddle combining those different elements.

I came up with this idea myself and I wrangled ChatGPT until it came up with the final image I was (more or less) pleased with. Otherwise, if my health wasn't so shitty, I might have taken the time and effort to do a watercolor on the concept, but realistically that's not possible anymore. Cheers.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Joke is fine, it’s just sad to see something that looks so grotesque in a community otherwise devoted to nature photography and an appreciation of these beautiful animals.

Not that my opinion should necessarily be relevant to you in any way but I think taking the 10 mins to paste actual owl heads over an actual photo of a…room full of important looking people…would have been funnier while also actually possessing some aesthetic value

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

it’s just sad to see something that looks so grotesque in a community otherwise devoted to nature photography and an appreciation of these beautiful animals.

Right mate, but WHAT EXACTLY sheltered world do you live in, in which a terrible disaster happens 'pon a wayward, funny owl post, eh?

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Yeah yeah with the sheltering and the big disaster. Listen dog, everything’s okay right now. We’re cool. Your joke is nice like I said. The image looks like trash, and I told you so directly because I’d rather not see trash here. You “prodded” it into existence in one second, right? Why get so defensive about it?

[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is Superbowl - where we give a hoot.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the sheltering and the big disaster

Okay, I'm listening!

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is this your final comment? You spammed a bunch of angry nonsense then deleted it over a period of three hours. I can still see the full text of all that in my inbox btw.

Genuinely just sad. And now what do you even want with this last message? Good job listening, here’s a gold star lol? This is really the zinger you finally settled on after all that?

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is really the zinger you finally settled on after all that?

Hah, I think it was moreso my catching myself and changing course. If an apology is in order, then I hereby offer it.

The problem on my end is that I like contributing where I can (on top of running my community) but am almost always working through a level of pain & fatigue, having a pretty much fatal disease in CFS/ME.

Admittedly, I have a short fuse when it comes to what I perceive as low-effort critique, even if it's just me mistaking the situation and replying inappropriately. I'm generally at the end of my rope at that point, and should undoubtedly be doing something else, even if it's just to ignore replies(!)

I've also been stung like this before when contributing occasional AI-aided content. A common thing seems to be people assuming I put zero creativity or effort in to coaxing out something which I thought was fairly amusing after my work and final edits. [for example]

OTOH, this has been about my sixth post across about two months in this particular sublemmy, and all have gone well so far until this one, which perhaps did slightly-less-well. "Anon6789" has been going above and beyond, and seeing that, I've wanted to help out when I can.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Well, thank you for taking the time to apologize and provide context

It’s awesome that you do so much to bring life into lemmy despite your medical situation. The situation at large here isn’t a reflection of you or your other contributions

A common thing seems to be people assuming I put zero creativity or effort in to coaxing out something

I read the rest of the comments here, and the post you linked to just now. The friction you’re running into with these posts isn’t related to you or your chronic illness or your posting history. Nobody is doing a background check on you before downvoting; most don’t even glance at your username

It’s just the nature of AI generated content. Nobody can tell what effort you may have invested in this type of post, you know? This is without even getting into the very long list of reasons why AI content is divisive in general. No matter what you and I discuss here, the situation will most likely repeat any time this type of content is posted away from one of the dedicated communities for it