this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
53 points (100.0% liked)

Biology

1635 readers
49 users here now

This is a general community to discuss of all things related to biology!

For a more specific community about asking questions to biologists, you can also visit:

/c/askbiologists@lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] lvxferre@mander.xyz 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It makes sense, when you look at other amniotes.

Sure, reptiles* show some signs of intelligence. Crocodiles use tools, monitor lizards recognise human faces, etc., those are all signs of cognitive capabilities. But it's simply not on the same level as your typical mammal or bird; it's like comparing a strawberry to a jackfruit, you know?

And yet, if these advanced cognitive capabilities we see in birds and mammals were inherited from their common ancestor, we'd see them in reptiles too.

*by "reptiles" I mean the paraphyletic group composed of the extant members of the clade Sauropsida, minus the nested clade Aves.

[โ€“] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

firstly birds aren't real. second, if birds were real, they're dinosaurs.