this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
123 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

36056 readers
206 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This week at the Munich Security Conference, Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the intelligence committee, played “I’ve got a secret.” It’s a game national security officialdom loves to play, slyly claiming authority ‘if they could only tell you what they know.’

It is in that vein that Warner spilled the beans on what he called the “real story” behind the law that could still ban TikTok.

“I want to see if you're going to tell the real story,” a grinning Warner said, addressing former congressman Mike Gallagher, and now a Palantir executive who, along with Warner, first introduced the bill that claimed that TikTok was a national security threat, a claim still relevant given the app’s uncertain future.

Gallagher described how the national security bill was dead until Hamas’ attack on Israel, which brought the legislation back to life. As Gallagher

“So we had a bipartisan consensus. We had the executive branch, but the bill was still dead until October 7th. And people started to see a bunch of anti-Semitic content on the platform and our bill had legs again.”

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

And people started to see a bunch of ~~anti-Semitic~~ anti-genocide/anti-zionist content on the platform

In case there was any confusion.

The American owned competitors' algorithms artificially steer the unwary user down a rage bait rabbit hole towards REAL anti-semitism from the far right, but the fundamentally corrupt politicians don't care about that since it doesn't offend their owner donors.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Everyone knew this for a long time, but nice to see some more confirmation.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Everyone certainly didn't know this. I got downvoted into oblivion for merely suggesting that this was more about Palestine than China.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Everyone meaning politically well informed people that are arguing in good faith.

[–] INeedMana@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

FWIW, It was new to me