this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2025
251 points (96.7% liked)

Greentext

5210 readers
778 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 23 points 11 hours ago

I'm too sick to shower. I haven't washed myself in months.

It sucks. I stink. OOPs friends are too polite.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 65 points 15 hours ago

"people say I smell like nothing now"

[–] lemmur@szmer.info 34 points 15 hours ago

Fake: Anon knows what the shower is.

Gay: Half of the post is about male skin kink.

[–] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 223 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

My brother said something similar "I never shampoo and my hair doesn't stink".

My wife and I informed him that his hair stank, and that we had to launder the pillowcase immediately after he stayed over because it stank up the room and adjacent hallway the day after.

OP got used to his BO, I promise you the people around him know he does not use soap.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 11 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I have also not shampooed my hair for an extended period, and you do have to rinse it when you shower. I would put soap on the ends every so often and I had to rinse it with baking soda a few times to remove cooking odors (onions mostly).
No one ever complained about a smell, but people tend not to say things like that.

[–] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 7 points 12 hours ago

Technically (🤓), you don't have to wash your hair because it's dead. The scalp is where the sweat, oils, and skin cells build up and where the bad odours would be coming from. And most people on average aren't really close enough to someone (especially a tall someone) to smell their scalp.

Personally, I tried the whole no shampoo thing, and it was agony. The roots of my hair hurt from the build-up if I don't wash them once week, only rinsing with water does nothing. Human bodies are weird.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 21 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

You don't need to shampoo your hair of course. Nature never provided us with a shampoo but you'll have nicer hair if you do.

It's the same for bathing obviously you don't have to do it, in the past everyone just spelled really bad. Not bathing isn't some magical cure for warts, and it absolutely is necessary for common decency's sake.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 6 points 11 hours ago

in the past everyone just spelled really bad

Lol, the fact that you spelled smelled as spelled made me smile.

But yea. It was just a fact of life. People lived in the countryside isolated and surrounded by animals so it smelled bad anyway. Even when people first started living in cities there wasn't any proper sanitation at first so you were constantly surrounded by the smell of your own and everyone else's shit.

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 9 points 13 hours ago

I have to disagree about the nicer hair. Once the oils in my hair balanced out, my hair was great. It was greasy for about a week and then it just took care of itself.

[–] stetech@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

Nature

Ever visit a zoo and notice any smells, e.g. in the ape house? That’s a part of nature, of course.

It’s just we’re trying to avoid that.

[–] TheBeesKnees@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 11 hours ago

I think we need to clarify things a bit here. "Clean hair" and "Shampoo'd hair" aren't the same things.

Everyone should clean their hair. Most people use shampoo for that, but it's not good for all hair types. Curly hair usually suffers with shampoo use.

[–] groats_survivor@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago

I shower daily, and I can't spell for shit

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 15 points 14 hours ago

Different people have different skin, oils, water supplies and diets.

Everyone needs to clean themselves regularly, but the exact details of what that means varies by circumstances.

Most people are fine with shampoo, a gentle soap, and warm water.
As long as you're getting rid of old dead skin, excess oils and any grime you're fine though. Soaps make that easier, but they're not a requirement.
I'm prone to dry skin and greasy hair, so I use a shampoo, cool water and a scrub brush instead of soap for my body. Perfectly clean, just need to scrub a little longer to make sure I get everything.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 132 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

people say I smell like nothing now

probably because it's instantly destroying any scent receptors permanently

[–] Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee 11 points 15 hours ago

Kinda like H2S, I guess. You can sense its putrid smell it in the range of 0.47 ppb to 100 ppm, then your olfactory nerve becomes paralyzed. Just when you think the gas is gone, there's a 50% chance of you dying at 800 ppm. Years ago, I read about a "mysterious deaths" case in which H2S was the main suspect because of this stealthy property.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 87 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (11 children)

As someone who doesn't use shampoo and has hair which has re-adapted to not having the natural oils stripped out, and doesn't use soap for the same reason, I am confident to say:

** Showers are a good thing. **

Just don't blast your skin with steaming hot water and your skins microbiome and keratin glands will adapt. Being "100% clean" will lead to sweat which stinks because of the heat-resistant bacteria which flourishes (thanks to a less diverse microbiome) and produces bad odour after digesting your sweat.

Sweat itself doesn't have a smell, it's why you don't stink the moment you start sweating.

What OP is doing here is fabricating a satirical story based on these principles.

[–] Lupus@feddit.org 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who doesn't use shampoo and has hair which has re-adapted to not having the natural oils stripped out

That's very likely not a thing. The natural oil production (sebum) is primarily influenced by genetics and hormones.

Some people experience less oiliness over time, but this is likely due to changes in distribution, absorption, and perception, rather than a true shift in sebum gland function.

Frequent washing with harsh shampoos can temporarily increase oiliness due to compensatory production.

However, studies suggest this is a short-term effect rather than a long-term change in sebum gland activity.

** Showers are a good thing. **

Absolutely, using shampoo or not, proper scalp hygiene is important, too much sebum creates bacteria friendly environments, which can lead to infections.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

As you said, the increase in oiliness is compounded upon daily use of shampoo. Using it frequently will eventually strip all of the oils out (if you've got long hair - People with shorter hair shouldn't have an issue).

There are certainly times where I use it, but it's very rare, it normally fucks my shit up for a good week.

[–] Lupus@feddit.org 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

As you said, the increase in oiliness is compounded upon daily use of shampoo

As a short term effect, not a long term change in sebum production, the sebum glands are most likely primarily genetically and hormonally controlled.

I also said

Some people experience less oiliness over time, but this is likely due to changes in distribution, absorption, and perception, rather than a true shift in sebum gland function.


Using it frequently will eventually strip all of the oils out (if you've got long hair - People with shorter hair shouldn't have an issue).

I know what you're saying, but it could be interpreted as that the glands on your scalp just stop producing altogether, which is not true and if it happens likely presents a serious medical issue.

I briefly touched on the distribution of oil in your hair - if you brush long hair thoroughly and frequently you distribute the oil from the glands to the tips, which gives the perception of less oilier hair and is in fact, very healthy. Oil in short hairs obviously distributes faster and more easily from the glands to the tips, so a more frequent use of shampoo doesn't impact healthy hair as much.

Like I said, proper scalp hygiene can accommodate a wide range of hair washing habits. But if you forego that you'll get nasty issues.

Edits: formatting

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Didn't mean to imply any impairment in sebum production, other than the increase to accommodate for the dryness. (Which can result in overly oily hair when you stop shampooing, which is a feedback loop your wallet really doesn't need to accommodate for).

For what its worth, my haircare routine consists entirely of warm water and a bit of a scrub.

People are genuinely amazed when I tell them I don't use shampoo or conditioner lol.

[–] WeLoveCastingSpellz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 49 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

You will not take away my hot showers liberals, grrr

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 38 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Hot showers are bourgeoisie propaganda, designed to keep the working class in a perpetual cycle of stank.

Think about it, the sales of hygiene products fuel our economies, they have us played for absolute fools.

Our hot showers come at the cost of energy, normally coal, which makes climate change worse, making us hotter, and more sweaty, leading to more hot showers.

Ten thousand years ago, our ancestors had no class divide, no climate change, and no hot showers.

Surely you see now that our only option is to rise up, and together, say "fuck this shit" and kill billionaires and stop taking hot showers.

And if you keep taking hot showers then you're enabling the fascist techno crypto oligarchy patriarchy.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got a lukewarm shower to attend.

[–] Mammothmothman@lemmy.ca 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Wow you sound like a certain instance that shal go unamed

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 25 points 21 hours ago

I know lol, I'm just playing along.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You may not smell bad immediately after going to the gym, but if you leave your sweaty gym clothes in the bag to ferment overnight, they're gonna smell like a dehydrated cat pissed in your bag.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Thats why I do my exercises in the nude.

[–] silasmariner@programming.dev 6 points 15 hours ago

As nature intended

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 7 points 15 hours ago

Blatantly fake. Smells fishy.

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 64 points 22 hours ago
[–] napkin2020@sh.itjust.works 17 points 19 hours ago

soap tax

bro

[–] Protoknuckles@lemmy.world 30 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If this worked, there's a ton of stinky people in my past who don't make sense.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 16 hours ago

Apparently they must have showered intermittently just enough to lose the benefit

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 23 hours ago

This guy is ripe.

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 7 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

i suspected that this image would pop up below that post. i'm not looking at that again lol

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 20 points 21 hours ago

(Reposting)

It’s a metaphor for the diabolical nonsense people constantly post on 4chan. Anon is either deluded (less likely) or attempting to lure others into unhealthy lifestyle decisions for fun. The main character is a robot, a la r9k, and the only ones cheering are other odd misfits. The women are, on the other hand, human shaped, once again reinforcing the gulf in humanity between the members of the board and those outside of it. Much of 4chan is poopie rapie.

With that said, yes, absolutely, I agree

[–] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 20 hours ago

what in the fuck

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago
[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 11 points 22 hours ago
[–] owl@infosec.pub 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 3 points 12 hours ago

No. Absolutely not, no. Not even ironically.

[–] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

I hate this so much

load more comments
view more: next ›