this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
153 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

4574 readers
373 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 68 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Google is the biggest threat to open web

Degoogle, deny the parasite engagement and profit.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Degoogle by getting a Google Pixel now!

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Unfortunately true ever since divestos stopped being developed. Living without a smartphone is pretty hard nowadays, but a reasonably secure and private smartphone (or anything really) is something reserved for the tech-enthusiast and you have to give money to Google.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What about GrapheneOS then?

[–] e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

It requires you to buy a Google Pixel Phone and its too complicated for the average user. Just look at the usage guide, I completely understand anyone who wouldn't want to deal with any of that.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

I miss CyanoGenMod back in the dizzay.

[–] Bali@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

Well i degoogled my Google Pixel with LineageOS and microG.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There are other options but yes pixel hardware is the best choice currently

[–] DacoTaco@lemmy.world -3 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

Everyone here is aware of the irony that the most effective way to degoogle is actually to use a pixel. Its dumb but its the reality.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

My next phone will be a Fairphone.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Funny thing is your sibling comment is criticising Mozilla trying to do just that :)

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I am not following. Which comment?

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 2 points 6 days ago

The one by JamonBear.

[–] JamonBear@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As Mozilla moves into advertising and AI, I wonder how long their position on Manifest v3 will last...

[–] Bali@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Indeed. And Mozilla never clearly say how long they'll support Manifest V2. The blog reads like typical corporate wording.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 5 points 6 days ago

Where do you think most of the current income comes from?

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If Mozilla drops Manifest v2 I might as well switch to a chrome variant (not brave).

I don’t want a web monoculture but it might as well be if Mozilla just copies chrome at every step.

[–] pory@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago

Reading this article makes it seem like they are doubling down on not dropping MV2, and instead maintaining both manifest versions so that they can retain maximum compatibility and options for the user.

Not supporting MV3 at all would likely hurt them a lot in the long run, and adding support for it to the existing MV2 only opens up more options for addon devs.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 days ago

That's a relief.

Gave me a heart attack with Mozilla and manifest v3 in the same subject

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (4 children)

What's the way forward for Chromium-based browsers? I use Edge instead of Chrome for my work (Firefox for everything else) to keep data out of Google's clutches since we use so many Google services. Since I use uBlock Origin on both I'm concerned Edge will follow the leader and take it away.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 22 points 6 days ago

To stop using them.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 days ago

"What's the way forward for coal-fired steam trains?"

[–] Balinares@pawb.social 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's an MV3 version of uBlock Origin, but it's kind of sparse. I switched to Adguard and it works just fine.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 7 points 6 days ago

Called uBlock Lite for a reason.

[–] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I've seen some occasional mentions of Cromite as an option for Chromium but not Chrome, so may be worth looking into. If open source isn't a key detail, Vivaldi may also be worth considering.

[–] heavydust@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

including new AI functionality

Yeah, more bullshit! I use Firefox because it's the only one with uBlock Origin.

We’ll keep you updated on what’s next for extensions in Firefox

They may be lying as usual which means I have to be proactive and find a future browser. It's sad that I can't trust Firefox anymore.

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 10 points 6 days ago

It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy if even a post explicitly stating that everything uBO needs to function correctly will keep being supported, is interpreted as the exact opposite "because they may be lying". Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee -4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Can't use Chrome, can't use Firefox. The only sane choice left is Safari. Is Apple the better alternative now?

Edit: don't be mistaken. I'm still using Firefox and have no plans to switch.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

You definitely can still use Firefox. They haven't added any AI nonsense beyond local translations and local image descriptions for accessibility. The article posted here is about how they're not removing MV2 support, so uBO still works on Firefox. Since Firefox is open source, I guarantee that the moment they try to change that there'll be a fork.

Stick with a Gecko browser to keep the market share up.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fennec on android and librewolf and mullvad on desktop

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How likely are those to remain viable once the source (Firefox) becomes too disparate?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org -2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Gonma cross that bridge once we get there...

But yes not very viable once mozila pulls a Donald Trump

I think there is do work being done on alternatives.

Also, firefox code base could be forked and we all will need to pay for it to be developed like adults

[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah we have all our eggs in this one basket now. Would be nice if Europe would fund an alternative or two.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 0 points 6 days ago

EU would rather fund US mega corps while buying Russian gas 🤡

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its nice they are keeping compatibility with version 2 but I feel its about forking time for an alternative.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've already been on Waterfox for years, personally.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

waterfox does not use manifest?

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't understand; are you asking a question?

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

yeah Im wondering then if waterfox maybe uses the original firefox add on thing.

[–] Flagstaff@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

I haven't limited into it much, but I don't see why not!

[–] unknown1234_5@kbin.earth 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

why not just not introduce the changes that do nothing but break ad blockers?

[–] Vincent@feddit.nl 5 points 6 days ago

That's literally what the post says is happening?