Idk. There's already plenty of right wingers (libertarians) in FLOSS spaces. I'd hate to see any more.
electric_nan
Waaayyy more likely Trump nukes them on July 4th just to flex.
You really do have to obsess if you take this seriously. It really isn't feasible for most people to devote kind of time and effort that I do on this stuff. I usually describe it as a kind of hobby, and I try to limit my advice to address specific concerns or threat models.
And like with Bush, will the "opposition" and media all just fall in line?
Can't prove a negative, but it's not like US policy towards Iran (or Israel) changes much from admin to admin. Here's Kamala right before the election saber rattling: https://www.cnbc.com/2024/10/08/harris-iran-greatest-adversary-trump-election.html
Apparently they are revolutionary ideas to democrats.
Absolutely. It is crystal fucking clear that Iran will never be safe until it has nuclear deterrence.
So you do understand part of what I'm saying, but not all of it. Yes, you can win with lies and you can win with the truth. You can also lose with either of them. Whichever way you go, you have to do it convincingly. Trump was convincing in his lies, and won. Kamala wasn't, and didn't. Does it do you any good to tell the truth unconvincingly in politics? This isn't a criticism of truth, it's a criticism of messaging and perception.
You can't paste it because I didn't say it. I said that you can win by lying. Is that not a fact?
Buh-bye.