this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
92 points (84.3% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

940 readers
148 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sag@lemm.ee 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

I think it only appears on .worlds modlog

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I think an 18+ rule for an instance that allows porn or federates with porn instances is reasonable. And when you interact with another instance's communities, you are beholden to their rules. And the admin who did it said they're talking about changing the rule. So it's not like they're just trying to be dicks.

So... I'm going to go with admins did what they had to, sag learned a tiny lesson about not giving people more information than they needed. I don't want to say YDI, though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blaze@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 3 days ago

@sag@lemm.ee FYI since I don't think you've seen the new comments on your initial post

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago

ptb

but....

I think it's great that we can expect actual rules and enforcement from instance admins, and have a chance to suss out the edges of these rules in open fora.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago

I'm half and half. I get it, liability and all.

I do think it's healthy for young people to get more info outside of the bubble of their family and school and we got away with crazy shit on the internet back in the day.

But that was also when the internet was relatively new and a lot of sketchy shit was being done to kids online during that time. Governments today are cracking down on sites that allow kids to use them, and no one wants to be the site admin who convinced yet another European country to draft draconian "think of the children" anti-privacy laws.

The other part of it too is, c'mon, basically rule #1 of using the internet is never admit when you're underage. Like every other Millennial out there, I was born on Jan 1, 1960.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›