this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
708 points (96.3% liked)

Canada

8799 readers
2408 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Could have imagined this happening as little as 3 years ago.

An ally sending a nuclear deterrent into our waters as a message/warning to the US. This normally happens to countries like Iran or North Korea

[–] ohulancutash@feddit.uk 13 points 19 hours ago

Still hasn’t happened. This was a sales pitch for a Canadian defence contract.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hey. Guess what? At the moment, we're the bad guys...

[–] XenGi@feddit.org 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At the moment? When was there ever a time the US weren't the bad guys?

[–] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Briefly the us was the good guys when we killed a bunch of slavers and then when we killed a bunch of fascists. Those were exceptions to the rule though.

[–] starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.ml 15 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Looks at founding fathers... Yeah killed the slavers. Puts blanket over Native Indians. Hides Chinese rail workers under rug. Renames Irish "Indentured workers"

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 9 points 19 hours ago

They also killed the Nazis, except for the ones that were useful, of course.

load more comments (3 replies)

I kinda root for them in the war of independence

[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

To be accurate, this is a nuclear propelled attack submarine. It does not carry nuclear warheads and is not what we normally call a "nuclear deterrent".

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Would a french submarine wear its hat like this:

or like this:

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Asking the real questions

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago

Holy shit I laughed out loud…

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Let's go! France is here to protect Canada!

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago

Na, they’re just finishing the 7years war-round 2

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

Idk about that. Other commenters have better explanations that aren't sensational.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

The scale of these things is always fascinating. They're always much larger than I think they are.

For reference, I think that's a Suffren class, making it just shy of 100m, or a tad longer than a football field for my fellow Americans.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The previously-mentioned French article says it's a Barracuda, but I don't know if that's a model or a class.

And unsurprisingly, he also decided to offer the Royal Canadian Navy its "premium" model, the Barracuda, rather than the Scorpène.

The Barracuda is (apparently) an export variant of the Suffren and is indeed a little shorter but still over 300 ft long.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

perchance, banana for scale?

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's a football field, Micheal. How big could it be, a banana?

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

It's there, but hard to see.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Finally. Letting the French keep a little bit of Canada pays off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 0ndead@infosec.pub 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

β€œBring it” - France probably

[–] starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.ml 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I believe it's "Le Bring it"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hux@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don’t tease me!

NOBODY backs an American Revolution like the French!

πŸ‡«πŸ‡·πŸ¦…πŸŽ†

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Important note: The "Nuclear" in "Nuclear attack submarine" means that it is powered by a nuclear reactor. It does not refer to its armament. An "attack" submarine means it is designed to attack ships and other submarines and these are typically not capable of carrying and launching ICBMs. Nuclear-armed deterrent submarines are called Ballistic Missile Submarines.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Don't forget all the cruise missiles - it's not just for attacking things at sea.

[–] peteyestee@feddit.org 11 points 1 day ago
[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)
[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 16 points 23 hours ago

Here's a French article about it. It's not a show of force, it's a naval defense company showing off their submarine in the hopes of being granted a 60 billion dollar contract for 12 submarines that the Canadian government announced last summer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] herrcaptain@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

During a period with seemingly very little good news in the world, I really needed this. Assuming it was done for the optics it conveys, it's some much needed reassurance that our allies actually have our back. Granted, we're still absolutely fucked in the short term if the worst happens, it's still nice to see.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago
[–] 60d@lemmy.ca 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Despite the clear evidence pointing to the image being old, the photograph is still circulating on social media platforms and has been featured in Google searches related to the supposed annexation threat. This highlights how misinformation can easily spread online, especially when fueled by sensational claims and misleading images.

https://holrmagazine.com/french-submarine-halifax-photo-real-or-fake-explained/

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 17 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

An article using random reddit comments as a source should be outright ignored, IMO.

Especially when said reddit comment has since been edited and no longer reflects what's written in the article. If you bother to follow the reddit link in the article, you'll find someone has replied with an actual source (from France) that shows that the photos are legit, however the title of this post (and the original posts on reddit) are misleading.

This isn't in reaction to American threats, it's a French naval defense company showing off their submarine in the hopes of obtaining a 60 billion dollar contract for twelve submarines that the Canadian government announced last summer.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί